The Flat Circle Of Republican Stupidity
It's your never-ending Sunday show rundown!
Republicans long for a past that never was, and this inevitably leads them to sound like idiots as they twist themselves into pretzels trying to rationalize their calls for societal regression. Need examples? Let's look at some in the Sunday shows!
We're Not Book Burning, You're the Book Burning!
Republican National Committee Chair Ronna Romney McDaniel was on "Fox News Sunday," and while discussing the party's post 2022 debrief report, she said a few things that were surprisingly truthful.
MCDANIEL: [...] biggest takeaway we are taking is independents did not break our way, which has to happen if we're going to win in 2024, which usually that's what causes that red wave. And abortion was a big issue in key states like Michigan and Pennsylvanian. [...] Republicans are migrating. They are migrating to red states. [...] But it means the White House electorally isn't available to us unless we go through a purple or blue state. And those states are getting bluer, because red voters are moving to the red states. [...] the path to the White House runs not just through independents, but every single Republican getting on board.
It's pretty shocking to hear anyone in the RNC, much less its chairperson, point out an objective reality. So what different actions or rhetoric do they plan to use to better their chances in 2024? Like, for example, abortion:
MCDANIEL: [...] What abortion is a bad idea to Democrats? Ninth month, eighth month, seventh month? They can't even articulate an abortion that's a bad idea. Gender selection, if it's a girl, you get to abort it. Tax-funded abortions for people where it's against their religious conscience. [...]
Nothing, then. They plan on changing nothing and expecting different results. If only there was a phrase for that.
Actually, correction, they do have another political strategy: The ole' "we're rubber, you're glue"!
When asked about Republican attacks on trans people, which are politically unpopular, McDaniel attempted some very strained whataboutism.
MCDANIEL: [...] the Democrats are using this word book banning. [...] That's a lie. There isn't book banning. What Republicans are doing are protecting our children and parental rights [...] But it's good to know the Democrats playbook and we're going to push on that, especially coming from the Democrat party that is banning freedom of speech, that is canceling people, that is destroying your life if you don't think with their orthodoxy. This is the Democrat Party who is saying if you think outside of the box and everything, we are dictating to you, you will make you lose your job, we will destroy you.
Republicans have literally been fighting Disney because it dared exercised free speech, made book banning much easier, extended Florida's "Don't Say Gay" bigotry, and threatened to separate children from parents who are not bigoted toward their trans kids. But, sure, it's the Democrats who are "destroying anyone who doesn't conform to orthodoxy and taking their jobs while threatening to destroy them."
Speaking of, how's that dirt file on fired Fox News host Tucker Carlson?
Let's Default Our National Debt!
House Republican Whip Tom Emmer appeared on CNN's "State of The Union" and wouldn't directly state that his party won't force a default on the nation's debt.
\u201cRep. Tom Emmer on CNN doesn't categorically guarantee that the US won't default on its debt\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1682861027
Host Dana Bash tried pointing out specifically how the cuts they want would hurt his constituents, but Emmer made it clear he will ignore them or just blame Nancy Pelosi when the reality doesn't match his delusions.
\u201cAfter Dana Bash presents him with a specific list of ways in which the House GOP debt ceiling/spending cuts bill would hurt his constituents in Minnesota, Emmer claims, "These are spending reforms. And all we're doing is going back to the Biden/Pelosi budget of last year."\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1682861027
GOP's Vanity Tech Douche Candidate Returns
NBC's "Meet The Press" had on Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Although considering his polling, calling him a candidate is a bit too generous, but nonetheless, we are all subjected to his stupidity on TV and expected to take him seriously. So fresh from giving Don Lemon his last good journalistic moment on CNN, Ramaswamy made Chuck Todd look like Walter Cronkite.
When Ramaswamy brings up an example of a person who says their gender doesn't align with their biological sex, he seems to know the difference between sex and gender. But when Todd questions his stance on gender being binary, Ramaswamy then perhaps deliberately conflates biological sex with gender.
RAMASWAMY: Well, there's, there’s two X chromosomes if you're a woman. An X and a Y, that means you're a man.
TODD: There's a lot of scientific research out there –
RAMASWAMY: There's a biological basis for this —
TODD: There's a lot of scientific research out there that says gender is a spectrum.
RAMASWAMY: Chuck, I respectfully disagree.
Funny how these transphobic clowns want to bring biology into this UNTIL scientific research disputes their transphobia and then they fall back on what they "feel" or disagree just because.
Ramaswamy also equates abortion with murder but says it's a "states' right issue." That's not how "states' rights" work, even if a Republican nominee barely polling above skim milk says so.
Asa Hutchinson's Decimal Points
Speaking of polling, Asa Hutchinson announced he was running for president almost exactly a month ago. He appeared on CNN's "State Of the Union" this week to call for going back to a Republican Party that died long before Trump came down an escalator in 2015. So how are Republican voters embracing this? We'll let this picture summarize it.
Can this change for Hutchinson? Likely not when he is polling lower than the fictional Conor Roy in "Succession," who we actually compared to Hutchinson too optimistically.
\u201cAsa Hutchinson\u2019s chances at being the GOP nominee:\u201d— M3Writer (@M3Writer) 1680530149
Phrasing, Steve Scalise!
When asked about any possible tension between himself and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on ABC's "This Week," Steve Scalise chose an odd way to describe their closeness yet trust.
\u201cSteve Scalise says he has an open relationship with Kevin McCarthy\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1682865629
Could be worse: Scalise could have kept misunderstanding what "raw dog" is.
\u201cHarrison Ford\u2019s character in SHRINKING using the term \u201craw dog\u201d incorrectly is comedy gold.\u201d— M3Writer (@M3Writer) 1682943663
Have a week
Biden Refuses To Listen To Helpful New York Times, Keeps Kamala Harris On Ticket
What a big jerk.
If you watched the video announcing Joe Biden's 2024 reelection campaign (we will give you the opportunity in a moment), you may have noticed something a little bit unusual: Vice President Kamala Harris is shown again and again (I counted at least 15 times and probably missed a couple jump cuts) in the video clips and still shots, usually with Biden or in group shots, but sometimes by herself. The video also includes quite a few solo images of First Lady Jill Biden, and one brief image of Harris and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff. Do more of those; they're a cute couple!
Harris's frequent appearances in the video are no coincidence, as NBC News reports, since the Biden campaign is actively seeking to increase Harris's profile as the campaign gets rolling. That's partly to overcome the inevitable curse of vice presidential invisibility — FDR's first veep John Nance Garner infamously said the office was "not worth a bucket of warm piss" — but also as part of a conscious strategy to call attention to her "role in the administration" and to push back on GOP efforts (helped along by the New York Times) to "turn her into a liability." And of course, making sure Harris is seen frequently in a positive light, it's hoped, may help reassure voters that the Age Thing (Joe Biden, it turns out, is fairly old!) isn't anything to panic about.
The NBC News piece notes that Harris's many appearances in the video mark a big contrast from Barack Obama's video announcing his 2012 reelection bid, which didn't mention or show Biden at all, not that Joe minded since it gave him more time to hang out on the White House roof listening to classic rock, grilling some steaks, and sharing a few brews with friends. It would appear that the 2024 campaign decided not to try to persuade The Onion to depict Harris as a loveable stoner doofus.
White House and campaign insiders were happy to tell NBC News that the goal here isn't simply to reassure voters that there's a qualified veep ready to step in if God Forbid, but also to give Harris her due as a central part of the administration:
“I know that the president sees the vice president as not only a historic leader, but a true partner to him, and she’s really been at the forefront of a lot of the work that we’ve done politically,” said Jaime Harrison, the chair of Democratic National Committee. “I really do believe that she’s going to be at the forefront and a crucial component of the re-election process.”
Asked about the plans to elevate Harris’ work, a senior White House official said: “What would be more accurate is that the vice president’s team and the West Wing have worked collaboratively around her leadership on women’s reproductive health care, her foreign policy leadership and other issues. She was a huge asset in the 2020 campaign, and West Wing advisers see her as a huge asset again.”
Honestly, we'd like to see more of that, since one of the things we liked about the Obama White House was his close working relationship with Biden. When Biden announced Harris would be his running mate in 2020, that was what he said he had in mind as a model for how he'd rely on his vice president for advice and feedback.
The GOP and rightwing media have made it their weird mission to attack Harris for anything they can make up, like that time Fox News pretended to be outraged at — yes really — her "French sounding" pronunciation of the word "the." Also, we regret to inform you, one time Kamala Harris bought a fancy pot. Then there are their constant insinuations that because she's Black and a woman, she's really an incompetent "affirmative action" hire who can barely string two coherent words together. No one's going to accuse them of subtlety.
Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch's New York Postgot in on that racist act this week, suggesting that the campaign announcement video had "muzzled" Harris, as if it would have been disastrous to let her speak. The only voice heard in the ad is Biden's, but the story didn't suggest that the campaign had "muzzled" Jill Biden, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, or the many (very photogenic) ordinary Americans shown in the ad. Still, the New York Post got one thing semi-right, if you don't mind sloppy writing: Harris is indeed the "administration’s foremost spokesman [sic] on the issue of abortion" since the Supreme Court overturned Roe; it's just that most of America doesn't see that as a liability.
So hell yes, let's see more Kamala Harris. As the NBC News story points out, she's quite adept at communicating the administration's message. At Howard University in DC, her alma mater, Harris on Tuesday "delivered a fiery speech" making the case for sticking with her and her boss:
“Now I stand here, proud to run for re-election with President Joe Biden as vice president of the United States of America, so we can finish the job,” Harris told a cheering crowd. “And I will say to everyone here that we are living, I do believe, in a moment in time where so many of our hard-won freedoms are under attack. And this is a moment for us to stand and fight.” [...]
“There is a national agenda at play by these extremist so-called leaders. And understand when you look at what they are up to: Their agenda is not only about attacking a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body; this agenda includes attacking your very right and freedom to express your voice through your vote at the ballot box,” Harris said.
Well hell yes. More of that, please.
[NBC News / The Onion / NYP / Photo: Gage Skidmore, Creative Commons License 2.0]
Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please give $5 or $10 a month so we can help you keep up with all of Kamala Harris's strange antics like pronouncing words correctly and calling for reproductive freedom. Like Cindy Lauper, she's SO unusual!
Abortion Clerical Errors
It's your very 'Pro-Life' Sunday show rundown
Republicans are in a weird state of flux and mostly can't agree on a cohesive message. Can we say "Republicans in disarray!" or "Conservatives in chaos"? Not quite yet, but they're all over the place. Let's dive in.
Schrödinger's Abortion Ban
Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy from Louisiana was on NBC's "Meet The Press" this week, where host Chuck Todd asked him about the Texas federal judge unilaterally deciding that he can undo the FDA's ability to determine drug safety.
Cassidy, who is also the top Republican on the Senate Health and Education Committee, was asked about why if he agreed with the decision on mifepristone, he didn't join Republican senators on the supporting brief. Cassidy tried to appear normal but failed.
CASSIDY: I mean, I'm not quite sure what you're asking there. I mean, I can sign on briefs all day. I'm not sure that has any great importance.[...] That particular ruling seems to be going through —it was on a process-oriented thing. Among the reasons that they ruled that way, I'm told, is that the FDA did not follow correctly the Administrative Procedures Act. Now, that's a question of fact. It can be resolved by the courts. It's actively being resolved.[...]
Funny that for the 20-plus years mifepristone has been FDA approved, only NOW we discover they made a clerical error and only after the Dobbs decision.
But if you're worried about Republican-run states or right-wing hack judges upending reproductive rights for everyone, Cassidy seems to think you're just paranoid.
CASSIDY: I think that's totally alarmist. It’s totally alarmist. [...]So, I mean, I think that's alarmist. [...]
If we had a dollar for every person who was labeled as paranoid or alarmist when warning about the danger of losing abortion access prior to Dobbs, Wonkette would not need to ask for donations to stay independently snarky (wink, wink).
But Cassidy gave the game away by dodging a question about Republicans' true goal regarding abortion rights. Todd asked if he would vote against creating a federal abortion standard, after he supported the 20-week abortion ban previously, and Cassidy stammered this nonsense.
CASSIDY: [...]You can give me theoreticals all day long. You truly can. I'm pro-life, by the way. I am pro-life. But the fact is, you're going to need 60 votes to get something through the Senate. What Tammy Baldwin was just talking about, there can be no restrictions in the states upon abortion, meaning that a child could be coming through the birth canal and could still be aborted, is that right? No, it's wrong. And most Americans think that is wrong. And the fact is, Tammy will not get that through the Senate. There's not 60 votes for allowing that. On a bipartisan basis, it's already been rejected. So I kind of reject giving me theoretical after theoretical just because I just – I mean, that's what you do if you want to fill air time and get people buzzing. But it's not how we actually govern.
Nice to know we're seen as "alarmist" by a guy who thinks children are aborted even as they are "coming through the birth canal," a lie so ridiculously stupid that it flies in the face of common sense.
Mia Love's Booing Of Encouragement
Mia Love, the former Republican representative from Utah, was on the panel discussion on CNN's "State Of The Union" and was asked about Mike Pence's very frosty reception at the NRA convention in his home state of Indiana.
\u201choly shit Pence is getting booed loudly at the NRA event\u201d— Aaron Rupar (@Aaron Rupar) 1681496534
Mia Love, however, saw it a different way.
\u201cWhen a \u201cBoo\u201d is not a \u201cBoo\u201d according to Mia Love.\u201d— M3Writer (@M3Writer) 1681740584
LOVE: It's really interesting. The booing sometimes doesn't mean that they're upset with you at the time. Sometimes, it's getting you to know, we're on you. You better do the right thing. It's a warning. Sometimes, it's a warning shot that says, we're coming after you unless you are giving us everything we need.
No one in the crowd was booing you, Mike Pence. They're saying "Boo-urns! Boo-urns!"
When Love was asked about Trump's attack on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis regarding his cutting of social safety net programs, she told a totally true, totally not made-up anecdote about Trump.
LOVE: I remember — do have to say this. I remember, when I was in the Oval Office, and Trump was there, and he was on the phone, and he was talking to... [...]No, but he just said: "No, those are my people. I'm not going to touch their — I'm not going to touch Social Security." [...] "They're my people. Those are my voters. I'm not going to touch Social Security" or — it's — so it's really interesting.
This quote would not sound like a "hipster coffee shop" story if there wasn't documented history of Trump saying one thing about protecting Social Security and then doing the opposite, despite the fun/disgusting Trump PAC ad portraying DeSantis' pudding fingers.
No additional context required
Have a week.
Hey Wisconsin People! You're Voting Today, Right? RIGHT?
Did you vote already? Good on you!
Not that there's much of a chance that anyone in Wisconsin has let it slip their minds, but today is Election Day, and the outcome of today's election for an open seat on the state supreme court will — no hyperbole here — be absolutely vital for voting and abortion rights and everything else about having a functional democracy going forward. The election is nominally nonpartisan, but everyone knows who's on what team.
Here, enjoy this brief explainer on why the election matters, a "TED Talk for Toddlers" that was twote by Julia Louis-Dreyfus yesterday:
\u201cOkay, this may be the most creative Wisconsin PSA so far (watch the whole thing) \ud83d\udc47 \n\nhttps://t.co/MGtYtIV785\u201d— Julia Louis-Dreyfus (@Julia Louis-Dreyfus) 1680556866
We like the part where the GOP gerrymander is represented by mean growling dinosaurs; it could only be improved by making one of the dinosaurs exclaim, "I say we call it democracy's grave!"
So really, that's all you need to know about why Wisconsin needs to elect Janet Protasiewicz (pronounced pro-tuh-SAY-witz) to the state Supreme Court. What, you want details? OK, a quick recap:
The Republican candidate, Daniel Kelly, is a far-right kook who's running attack ads that are literal shot-by shot remakes of George HW Bush's infamous Willie Horton ads. Kelly advised the state GOP on how to submit fake electors in the 2020 election. Before Scott Walker appointed him to the state Supreme Court, Kelly wrote that marriage equality for LGBTQ folks would "rob the institution of marriage of any discernible meaning.” He also compared affirmative action to slavery. Kelly lost his seat in 2020 to Jill Karofsky, but he's back to try to secure Wisconsin's extreme GOP gerrymander for another decade (not that he'd say so openly, although before his appointment, he'd literally worked with the RNC to create the gerrymandered maps).
The Democrat, Protasiewicz, is a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge who is very open about supporting reproductive freedom and has made clear she won't stand for gerrymandering. She says that she will of course be guided by the law in any decisions, but it's hardly bias to say that she's for women's equality and for fair electoral representation, those being things the law allegedly is also pretty big on.
Also, we are very certain that Judge Protasiewicz does not have an evil laugh.
She does, however, have a big fundraising advantage over Kelly, but don't let that lead anyone to stay at home, because good Crom, this is finally a chance to return democracy to Wisconsin. Remember what happened when Michigan unfucked its maps? And yes, unfucking Wisconsin's gerrymander could very well give Democrats the chance to retake the US House in 2024, too. Oh yes, and it sure would be nice not to have a state supreme court that might be inclined to hand the 2024 presidential election to Republicans.
In conclusion, I completely forgot to take my break and wrote this instead, so it's lunch time! Vote, damn you.
[American Independent / RawStory / Wisconsin Public Radio]
Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please help out with a monthly $5 or $10 donation, and maybe Dok will remember to eat.